The threat of war, and especially nuclear war, will place or induce stress and trauma in many, including civilians.
This is so even when they are not in the war zone or under direct threat.
The quickest way to resolve this is (would be) to resolve the threat (make it disappear).
This website's proposal can potentially resolve stress and avoid trauma from (ivestment of) 5,000 euros.
It could very well save your life, that of your family and your peers, and also give you a return on the 5,000 euros invested.
Although this site's proposal needs a little more to make this happen (at some point you need to travel to your newest safe haven and paradise).
even without imediate or short term traveling it is a first and it certainly is the most important step, and we assume that for many this first step could solve and or prevent the problem (stress and trauma).
While the proposal in this site needs a bit more to make this happen (you need to travel to you newest safehaven and paradis), even without traveling it is a first and most important step and we assume that for many this first step could solve the (acute and future) stress and avoid or cure trauma for you, your family and peers.
in 2020 CDC concluded (figure 02, CDC 2020) that the latest Pandemic created a "Perfect Storm".
When you put this in perspective in a time frame, the latest pandemic is a later (latest) fase of several worrisome dynamics that together could be considered a "health perfect storm" with a AMR component.
This worrisome dynamics that together could be considered a "health perfect storm" certainly caused economic hardship.
such hardship, as in many historical cases, can have triggered or increased conflicts and the wars that now haunt the world and increase the threat and risks for "nuclear war" and a consequential "nuclear winter".
we pick this reasening or line of thinking back up in a moment.
AMR is a worry at least since 2010 (figure 01, WHO).
science is aware resistance is on the rise since before 2.000.
That means in the "detect and controle" strategy of the (modern time) health organizations a certain incertainty or weakness is on the rise, this most probably allowed for more "bacterial infections".
Simultaneously (since 2.000) viruses and more specifically coronavirus becomes a threat, but do not go worldwide, and consequently are not considered and declared pandemics.
Simultaneous cognitive decline, even genetic decline like in autism, are on the rise before 2.000
Simultaneously life expectancy gets in decline, and maternal mortality gets on the rise, also or especially in developed countries, especifically in the united states.
Simultaneously genetic decline like in autism (dementia, alzheimer, etc) is on the rise before 2.000.
Scientists and "health organizations" need to look into the associations that are clearly there since 2.000 or even before.
Looking only at the pandemic fase (and at one particular virus) could make us fail to see the multiple causes (all adding up) of the storm and make us fail to solve the "perfect storm" (or storms, because after all the factors are temoraly and spatially associated).
If you see this as a period with worrysome dynamics (or one "perfect storm") than it is clear that AMR was there since the very beginning, and a particular family of virus (coronavirus family) only became a global problem (and cause of death) at the end of that "perfect storm" that began in the year 2.000 and even before and grew untill the pandemic and probably after ("extra deaths", "long covid", etc).
Dr Mike Ryan associates the threat of several endemic diseases to emerge, any time soon, to climate change (because the same source announces both, for simplicity I am so free to call these announced endemic diseases (zoonoses) "Disease X" or the Dr Mike Ryan "Disease X".
It is easy to see that Dr Mike Ryan and WHO research and operate in close cooperation, and that WHO together with Dr Mike Ryan annouces "Disease X" without pinning it down to one or more diseases.
While he does not really justifies his reasening, nor the association he suggests, I think that his view and the seemingly quick and abrupt association he makes extremely interesting (essential) as long as "climate change" is seen wide enough (not limited to increase of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere).
Limiting "climate change" o increase of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is an underestimation (and possibly distraction) of the problem ("perfect storm") and probably creates a relative "false security" ("if we solve carbon dioxide we solved it all") that could make that we never solve the "perfect storm" and go extinct without ever really knowing why.
An "Action Plan" that would focus on agroforest and regeneration of soils would also solve climate change and according to Dr Mike Ryan and indirectly to WHO (and Unites Nations) the increasing threats "including" "Disease X".
Independant of all this, my own research led me to the conclusion that in order to solve "climate change" and the "perfect storm" we need this "action plan" that focuses on "agroforest" and the "regeneration of soils".
For those that are interested, the next video explains how and by how much enriched agroforest would solve "climate change", including the best (or nearly only) known aspect of "climate change".
AGROFORESTS and ACTION PLAN for EXISTENCE 01
For those that think the subject is interesting please also see the next two videos that explain the action plan that will not fail to solve all the climate change aspects, and since this plan will increase biodiversisty it will not fail to also solve the "perfect storm".
I am confident to claim this since loss of biodiversity (as is the case in modern monoculture agriculture) leads to more endemic diseases in the animal world that as we know are expected to break through the human animal interface (Dr Mike Ryan), caused or triggered by "climate change" that is reversed by (enriching of) agroforests and regenerating soils.
At the same time this "Action Plan" will increase greatly our autonomy and our chances to survive any threat by conflicts and war, and especially by nuclear war(s) and nuclear winter(s).
AGROFORESTS and ACTION PLAN for EXISTENCE 02
Since very few people understand agrofores and much less the enriched agroforest concept that i propose to solve climate change, i am so free to illustrate it in a very simplyfied form.
This simplified example ilustrates natural pest control.
Such natural pest controle is very comparable with controle of the diseases that threaten us and which dr mike ryan claims they will brake through the human animal interface and cause the next pandemic or "Disease X"
"Cocoa agroforestry systems" can bring a wide range of ecological benefits; biodiversity conservation of flora and fauna, carbon sequestration, preserving and strengthening soil moisture and fertility, contributing to pest control, and microclimatic control such as stimulating rainfall, and many other benefits.
A simple search on the internet could answer many doubts that you could have regarding this subject of stress and trauma.
An exemple of a search you could carry out could be: "mental health issues caused by war".
THE MENTAL HEALTH EFFECTS OF WAR: BACKED BY SCIENCE
The Mental Health Effects of War: Backed by Science | University of Utah Health
...
events in Ukraine are being broadcast live not only through traditional news outlets but on apps like Instagram, Twitter, and TikTok at a rate never seen before.
Violent images and videos are spreading like wildfire.
Some videos tagged with #UkraineWar have been seen 600 million times in just a few days.
These images, videos, and audio clips can be triggering for everyone and have an immense psychological impact.
There have always been troublesome global conflicts.
Still, with the recent civil unrest in Syria, instability in Iraq, conflicts in other countries, and the COVID-19 pandemic, the invasion in Ukraine is another on the already lengthy list of traumatic events that can negatively affect our mental health.
"The long-term effects of trauma are significant," says Steve Sugden, MD, a colonel in the US Army Reserves and a psychiatrist at Huntsman Mental Health Institute (HMHI).
Sugden knows first-hand what it is like to be on the battlefield and is a medical expert on how trauma can affect our mental health.
Sugden suggests that there are some common mental health consequences of war and that those viewing traumatic content are also at risk.
"Civilians, soldiers, and those consuming the war through social media can develop the typical psychological profile of trauma."
Steve Sugden, MD, HMHI
How War Affects Our Mental Health
The World Health Organization (WHO) has stated that in situations of armed conflict, "Around 10 percent of the people who experience traumatic events will have serious mental health problems, and another 10 percent will develop behavior that will hinder their ability to function effectively."
Depression, anxiety, and psychosomatic problems such as insomnia are the most common effects. Sugden focuses on three populations susceptible to negative mental health consequences:
Civilians within the targeted homeland
The soldiers on both sides of the conflict
Those consuming the images, videos, and audio of the war through social media apps, television, radio, and the web
"Surprisingly, the civilians within the conflict tend to be the group with the least amount of psychological trauma—yet it still can be significant," says Sugden. L
Less trauma may be the result of civilians' ability to talk immediately with their social network and process their emotions, which helps to build resilience.
intermezzo or note of this site:
having realisted a total or partial solution like proposed in this site would have this effect and the effect would be sustained
end of intermezzo.
The long-term effects of trauma on soldiers are significant.
"We have seen increases in homelessness among the US veteran population, and this group has the highest suicide rate compared to any other population," says Sugden.
Soldiers worldwide are in the position to be exposed to traumatic events, and with traumatic exposure comes higher overall medical complications, dysfunction within families, unemployment, substance use, and more.
"But all three groups, including civilians, can develop the typical psychological profile of trauma.
Equally important, all three groups can develop mistrust, suspicion, and a sense of hopelessness when it comes to conflict close to home or far away," explains Sugden.
"Studies have shown that consumers of a war via television, social media, or other forms of media can be just as impacted as the actual individuals within the conflict."
...
RESULT OF THIS SEARCH : Can war trigger schizophrenia?
Traumatic war. Stress & schizophrenia
1. An examination of the effects of the Lebanese war on the citizens found that traumatic war events can be regarded as of primary importance for risk factors triggering the onset of schizophrenia.
2.The overall findings indicate an increase in the rate of admission for men diagnosed with schizophrenia throughout the 12 years of the war.
The most significant increases occurred either following intensive fighting episodes or months later due to the additive effect of stress.
3. How soon individuals are affected by environmentally induced war stress may be related to their level of vulnerability to the disorder.
Traumatic war. Stress & schizophrenia - PubMed
What happens to citizens during war?
Not all civilian casualties result from direct violence. Many deaths stem from indirect causes, including war-induced poverty, hunger, and medical shortages. Death rates surge when civilians lack access to reliable medical care.10 Oct 2023
The Civilian Consequences of Conflict - World101
The Civilian Consequences of Conflict | World101 (cfr.org)
Not all civilian casualties result from direct violence.
Many deaths stem from indirect causes, including war-induced poverty, hunger, and medical shortages.
Death rates surge when civilians lack access to reliable medical care.
In Syria, Russian fighter jets have bombed hospitals so frequently that healthcare workers have resorted to moving their facilities into reinforced basements and caves.
Even those facilities have been targeted by bunker-buster bombs. The destruction of the country’s healthcare system has contributed in part to a decline in Syria’s average life expectancy by as much as twenty years.
Conflict also exacerbates food insecurity.
In 2019, ten out of the world’s thirteen most urgent food crises were in conflict zones. Grocery stores in conflict-affected countries often have empty shelves.
What limited supplies do exist are often prohibitively expensive.
In many cases, a meal can cost more than a day’s wages.
The cost of a plate of bean stew in South Sudan, where civil war has raged since 2013, is equivalent to $348 in New York. As a result, nearly half a billion people go hungry in conflict zones.
Do civilians suffer the most in war?
Casualties usually refer to both dead and injured. In some calculations, deaths resulting from famine and epidemics are included. Starting in the 1980s, it has often been claimed that 90 percent of the victims of modern wars are civilians, repeated in academic publications as recently as 2014.
Civilian casualty ratio - Wikipedia
In armed conflicts, the civilian casualty ratio (also civilian death ratio, civilian-combatant ratio, etc.) is the ratio of civilian casualties to combatant casualties, or total casualties. The measurement can apply either to casualties inflicted by or to a particular belligerent, casualties inflicted in one aspect or arena of a conflict or to casualties in the conflict as a whole. Casualties usually refer to both dead and injured. In some calculations, deaths resulting from famine and epidemics are included.
Starting in the 1980s, it has often been claimed that 90 percent of the victims of modern wars are civilians,[1][2][3][4] repeated in academic publications as recently as 2014.[5] These claims, though widely believed, are not supported by detailed examination of the evidence, particularly that relating to wars (such as those in former Yugoslavia and in Afghanistan) that are central to the claims.[6] Some of the citations can be traced back to a 1991 monograph from Uppsala University[7] which includes refugees and internally displaced persons as casualties. Other authors cite Ruth Leger Sivard's 1991 monograph in which the author states "In the decade of the 1980s, the proportion of civilian deaths jumped to 74 percent of the total and in 1990 it appears to have been close to 90 percent."[8]
A wide-ranging study of civilian war deaths from 1700 to 1987 by William Eckhardt states:
On the average, half of the deaths caused by war happened to civilians, only some of whom were killed by famine associated with war...The civilian percentage share of war-related deaths remained at about 50% from century to century. (p. 97)[9]
Civilian casualty ratio - Wikipedia
"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civilian_casualty_ratio#:~:text=Casualties%20usually%20refer%20to%20both,publications%20as%20recently%20as%202014"
The Mental Health Effects of War: Backed by Science
https://healthcare.utah.edu › hmhi › news › 2022/03 › m...
28 Mar 2022 — "But all three groups, including civilians, can develop the typical psychological profile of trauma. Equally important, all three groups can ...
The Mental Health Effects of War: Backed by Science | University of Utah Health
"https://healthcare.utah.edu/hmhi/news/2022/03/mental-health-effects-of-war-backed-science"
Mental Health Aspects of Prolonged Combat Stress in Civilians
National Center for PTSD (.gov)
https://www.ptsd.va.gov › specific › combat_stress_civilian
by J Hamblen · Cited by 9 — Particularly horrific stressors experienced by some civilians during war include torture, beatings, rape, forced labor, witnessing sexual abuse ...
www.ptsd.va.gov ("https://www.ptsd.va.gov/professional/treat/specific/combat_stress_civilian.asp")
Jessica Hamblen, PhD and Paula Schnurr, PhD
Following the events of September 11 (th), America braced itself for a war against terrorism. Americans have been told by the government on several occasions to be on alert for future attacks and have experienced widespread fear from unknown sources of Anthrax. Several weeks after the terrorist attack, America went to war against Afghanistan. With the onset of the war came the fear of retaliation. These events are different from single-incident disasters because Americans report ongoing fear.
Typically when we think about being exposed to traumatic events during a war, we think about what soldiers experience (e.g., being fired upon, becoming a prisoner of war, sustaining an injury, or witnessing serious injury or death). However, civilians who are not directly involved in the war effort are also frequently confronted with war-related stressors. Some typical civilian stressors include life threat; being bombed, shot at, threatened, or displaced; being confined to one's home; losing a loved one or family member; suffering from financial hardships; and having restricted access to resources such as food, water, and other supplies. Particularly horrific stressors experienced by some civilians during war include torture, beatings, rape, forced labor, witnessing sexual abuse of or violence toward a family member, and mock execution.
In This Article
What are the long-term effects for civilians exposed to war stress?
What are the long-term effects for civilians exposed to war stress?
Is exposure to war stressors associated with physical health problems in civilians?
How do children respond to prolonged stress?
Most of the research on the effects of war on civilians has been conducted on refugee samples and people who were displaced as a result of war. Compared to other war-exposed civilians, these individuals' experiences may be more traumatic not only because of the situations that led to their exile but also because of stressors experienced in refugee camps and during the process of resettlement. In general, refugees exhibit high rates of PTSD and depression as well as other psychiatric problems, particularly if they were tortured (1). For example, in a survey of Bosnians from a refugee camp in Croatia who experienced on average more than six traumatic events, approximately one third had depression and one quarter had PTSD. Twenty percent met criteria for both disorders. Refugees with both depression and PTSD were five times more likely to report being physically disabled than refugees with no psychiatric symptoms (2).
PTSD and other problems are prevalent in nonrefugee samples as well. An article in a 2001 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association reported on PTSD in survivors of war or mass violence in four low-income countries (3). Rates of PTSD were 37.4% in Algeria, 28.4% in Cambodia, 17.8% in Gaza, and 15.8% in Ethiopia. These rates are considerably higher than the U.S. rate of 8% (4). One suggested explanation for the significantly higher rate in Algeria is that the terrorist attacks were still ongoing when PTSD was assessed. Overall, several risk factors for PTSD were identified, including torture and the experience of trauma after the age of 12.
Results from studies of refugees and impoverished countries may be difficult to generalize to Western cultures. However, findings from more industrialized settings such as Israel and Beirut may be more relevant to American civilians. Studies from the Gulf War suggest that, during the early weeks of the war, there was a marked rise in stress for people of all ages. However, the stress level dropped off within a few weeks (5).
For example, data were collected on all casualties that arrived in the emergency departments of 12 local hospitals after actual missile attacks and false alarms. Almost 75% of admissions were for stress reactions or unjustified atropine injections.
The highest number of psychological casualties occurred during the first two missile attacks, after which the numbers declined (6). Another study found that while approximately half of the participants in a study sample reported sleep problems during the war, there was significant improvement 30 days after the war ended (7). Similar results were found in a study following the 1982 Lebanon-Israel war.
Almost 12,000 Israelis (civilians?) were interviewed regarding their mood on eleven different occasions between 1979 and 1984.
Outbreak of war coincided with an increase in depression. Incidence of depressed moods peaked at the time of the Palestinian massacre at the refugee camps, and then it dropped below baseline even though conflict continued. Thus, many civilians respond to prolonged war with various stress symptoms, but as time passes people seem to recover and stress levels return to normal.
Although most civilians who are exposed to war stress will not develop long-term mental-health problems, some will, particularly if they have been exposed to severe stressors. Much research on this topic has been conducted with Holocaust survivors. In a study of 124 Jewish Holocaust survivors, 46% met criteria for PTSD. In a community sample of Israelis age 75 and older, 27% of male and 18% of female Holocaust survivors met criteria for PTSD as compared to 4% percent of males and 8% of females who did not experience the Holocaust (8). These statistics make it clear that PTSD symptoms will persist throughout Holocaust survivors' lifetimes. Similarly, data from a long-term follow-up study of civilians in Holland 50 years after World War II indicate that 4% of the population exposed to a war related event have PTSD. Only 1.5% of nonexposed individuals in this same category have PTSD (9).
There is accumulating evidence that PTSD is associated with long-term physical health problems. In terms of research on civilians exposed to war, there is evidence from an epidemiological study of civilians in Beirut that exposure to war events is associated with higher mortality rates. Men exposed to five or more traumas were more than twice as likely to die sooner than non-exposed men while women exposed to five or more traumas were almost three and a half times as likely to die earlier than non-exposed women (10). In a previous study on heart disease and wartime stressors, it was found that people with heart disease were five times more likely to have crossed the "green-line" (demarcation lines that divide the capital of Beirut into two sectors and separate the belligerent parties) than patients without heart disease. This suggests that there is a relationship between heart disease and wartime stress (11). There is also evidence that war may affect the immune system, as evidenced by a sample of displaced women from Croatia who had altered psychological, hormonal, and immunological activity (12).
Most research on the effects of prolonged stress on civilians has been carried out on adult samples. The literature suggests that children are also affected but that the majority will not suffer from long-term consequences. For example, following the period of SCUD missile attacks in Israel during the Gulf War, children ages 10-15 were asked to describe what they thought life would be like for children their age next year. Their dominant perception was positive (73%), although children who reported greater postwar reactions held more pessimistic views (13). Several months after the war, children ages 10-15 reported that they were more concerned about traffic accidents, relations with friends, and their studies than about missile attacks (14). A one-year follow-up of children showed that high school students from high-risk areas reported no war symptoms except sensitivity to loud noises, which was reported by about one out of five children (15). As is the case with adults, children living in refugee camps experienced more psychological problems than nonrefugee children (16).
This review provides a description of how civilians respond to prolonged stress. The hope is that this information might help clinicians predict how U.S. and other civilians may be affected by ongoing war. However, there does not exist a sufficient body of research regarding events that resemble the present situation. Therefore, in addition to research on the Gulf War, research on refugees and low-income countries was reviewed. The literature on children was reviewed separately.
Overall, although many civilians may be affected in the short run, it is expected that in the long-term most people will not be severely affected. Studies of both children and adults following the Gulf War indicate that stress levels returned to normal shortly after the end of the war. A consistent finding is that people who experience more extreme stress will display more severe symptoms than those who experience less intense exposure or only a threat of violence. Therefore, civilians who directly experience or witness terrorist attacks, or who had a close friend or family member killed, will likely exhibit more extreme stress responses. And, for this subset of civilians, their reactions may be intense and long lasting.
Figure 03
Figure 04
https://youtu.be/kzrud1QAHGI?si=RJxVQNXUkhWjD6De
Figure 05
LIVE from #WEF24 with @DrTedros: Preparing for a ‘Disease X’
https://www.youtube.com/live/0O4n5Cf75ZM?si=MLMo4C70SxpcXgcf
Figure 07
https://youtu.be/bQ_AvcTP5u0?si=8t6wOIkmlYf2Ki1U
If you are an international BUSINESS BROKER or PROPERTY DEVELOPER, please get in touch, I am the legal owner of a 650 HA (650 HECTARES) URBAN BEACHFRONT LAND, which at the same time is the world's best safe haven against all major actual threats and perfect storm (AMR and NUCLEAR WINTER).